ArticleScientific reports2018
The implication of DNA bending energy for nucleosome positioning and sliding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nucleosome wrapping energy in CpG islands and the role of epigenetic base modifications.eLife · 2025Article
- Interfacial water confers transcription factors with dinucleotide specificity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- A deformation energy model reveals sequence-dependent property of nucleosome positioning.Chromosoma · 2021Article
- Nucleosome Assembly and DisassemblyFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Deform-nu: A DNA Deformation Energy-Based Predictor for Nucleosome Positioning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleosome not only directly affects cellular processes, such as DNA replication, recombination, and transcription, but also severs as a fundamentally important target of epigenetic modifications. Our previous study indicated that the bending property of DNA is important in nucleosome formation, particularly in predicting the dyad positions of nucleosomes on a DNA segment. Here, we investigated the role of bending energy in nucleosome positioning and sliding in depth to decipher sequence-directed mechanism. The results show that bending energy is a good physical index to predict the free energy in the process of nucleosome reconstitution in vitro. Our data also imply that there are at least 20% of the nucleosomes in budding yeast do not adopt canonical positioning, in which underlying sequences wrapped around histones are structurally symmetric. We also revealed distinct patterns of bending energy profile for distinctly organized chromatin structures, such as well-positioned nucleosomes, fuzzy nucleosomes, and linker regions and discussed nucleosome sliding in terms of bending energy. We proposed that the stability of a nucleosome is positively correlated with the strength of the bending anisotropy of DNA segment, and both accessibility and directionality of nucleosome sliding is likely to be modulated by diverse patterns of DNA bending energy profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.