Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29891901›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2018

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection: a systematic review.

Francesca Menchini, Giacomo Toneatto, Alba Miele, Simone Donati, Paolo Lanzetta, Gianni Virgili

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of aflibercept using a prefilled syringe - a multicenter study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intravitreal therapy-success stories and challenges.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Bactericidal activity of three different antiseptic ophthalmic preparations as surgical prophylaxis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MenchiniDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. francescamenchini@gmail.com.
Giacomo ToneattoDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Alba MieleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Florence, A.O.U.C, Florence, Italy.
Simone DonatiOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-7021
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Gianni VirgiliDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Florence, A.O.U.C, Florence, Italy.
University of Udine · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effect of topical antibiotic prophylaxis on the rate of post-operative endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection (IVI).

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies comparing the rates of endophthalmitis in eyes receiving IVI of different drugs with and without topical antibiotic prophylaxis, by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE up to June 2016. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies, respectively. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to compute the odds ratio (OR) of endophthalmitis with antibiotic prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis and conducted subgroup analyses to compare the efficacy of different regimens and classes of antibiotics on endophthalmitis rates.

resultsWe identified 1 randomized and 12 non-randomized studies that reported 74 cases of endophthalmitis in 147,203 IVIs using antibiotic prophylaxis compared with 55 cases in 211,418 IVIs with no prophylaxis. The overall OR of endophthalmitis for antibiotic prophylaxis vs. no prophylaxis was 1.33 (95% CI 0.75-2.38). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses showed that the exclusion of the only study with a serious risk of bias significantly increased the risk of endophthalmitis in the antibiotic prophylaxis group compared with control (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.34). There was no difference in the endophthalmitis rate associated with any other factor analyzed, including type of antibiotic, type of drug injected, or antibiotic prophylaxis regimen.

conclusionsAntibiotic prophylaxis does not reduce the rate of endophthalmitis following IVI and might potentially be associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisEndophthalmitisHumansIncidenceIntravitreal InjectionsOdds RatioAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29891901
PMCPMC6137222
OpenAlexW2808692785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.