ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Foliar Terpene Traits in
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics prediction of terpene constituents and phenolic traits in Eucalyptus globulus using Bayesian models and tree-based machine learning.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of Ulmus minor reveal dynamic intrageneric clusters of resistance genes.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Mutual information-based best linear unbiased prediction for enhanced genomic prediction accuracy.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Genomic selection optimization in blueberry: Data-driven methods for marker and training population design.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Enhancing prediction accuracy of foliar essential oil content, growth, and stem quality inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Economic potential of essential oil production from New Zealand-grown Eucalyptus bosistoana.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Heritable Variation of Foliar Spectral Reflectance Enhances Genomic Prediction of Hydrogen Cyanide in a Genetically Structured Population ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Effect of number of annual rings and tree ages on genomic predictive ability for solid wood properties of Norway spruce.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Inheritance of Rootstock Effects in Avocado (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Landscape drivers of genomic diversity and divergence in woodland Eucalyptus.Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Converge to Accelerate Forest Tree Breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Is There a Relationship Between Secondary Metabolites of Leaves and the Growth of Eucalyptus Species?Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike agricultural crops, most forest species have not had millennia of improvement through phenotypic selection, but can contribute energy and material resources and possibly help alleviate climate change. Yield gains similar to those achieved in agricultural crops over millennia could be made in forestry species with the use of genomic methods in a much shorter time frame. Here we compare various methods of genomic prediction for eight traits related to foliar terpene yield in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.