Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29891730›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Neural Prediction Errors Distinguish Perception and Misperception of Speech.

Helen Blank, Marlene Spangenberg, Matthew H Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictive Neural Computations Support Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence from MEG and Competitor Priming.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Aging Brain and Hearing: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen BlankMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7E, United Kingdom, hblank@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-0811
Marlene SpangenbergMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7E, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-3476
Matthew H DavisMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7E, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-0778
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/5Medical Research Council RG91365/SUAG/008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans use prior expectations to improve perception, especially of sensory signals that are degraded or ambiguous. However, if sensory input deviates from prior expectations, then correct perception depends on adjusting or rejecting prior expectations. Failure to adjust or reject the prior leads to perceptual illusions, especially if there is partial overlap (and thus partial mismatch) between expectations and input. With speech, "slips of the ear" occur when expectations lead to misperception. For instance, an entomologist might be more susceptible to hear "The ants are my friends" for "The answer, my friend" (in the Bob Dylan song

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansIllusionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultfMRImisperceptionpredictive codingprior expectationsrepresentational similarity analysisspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID29891730
PMCPMC6596154
OpenAlexW2808292847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.