ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2018
Intraosseous schwannomas involving the sacrum: Characteristic imaging findings and review of the literature.
Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathological Fracture in the Metatarsal Bone Due to an Intraosseous Schwannoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Rare presentation of a spinal schwannoma with fluid-fluid level: A case report on radiological features, histopathological correlation, and surgical management.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Sacral intraosseous schwannoma in an adolescent patient: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Distinguishing Characteristics of Benign Versus Malignant Intraosseous Schwannomas: A Comparative Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Imaging Features of Intraosseous Schwannoma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Successful management of a rare radius schwannoma mimicking malignant bone tumors: A case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- An assessment of fluid-fluid levels on magnetic resonance imaging of spinal tumours.Skeletal radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose Sacral intraosseous schwannomas represent a rare subset of schwannomas. The existing literature detailing the radiographic appearance of intraosseous schwannomas is limited. The aim of this study is to formally characterize the radiological appearance of sacral intraosseous schwannomas to differentiate them from other lytic lesions. Materials and methods Imaging studies of 13 pathologically proven intraosseous schwannomas were reviewed from multiple institutions by fellowship-trained radiologists. A PubMed search was performed and identified four papers pertaining to the imaging characteristics of sacral intraosseous schwannomas. The results of these papers were compared to findings from our cases. Results All tumors had heterogeneous signals and were predominately solid but cystic components with fluid-fluid levels were present. The tumors caused a mass effect but none infiltrated the surrounding soft tissues. Post-contrast T1-weighted images revealed heterogeneous enhancement in all 13 tumors and four possessed non-enhancing cysts. A literature review identified 16 other cases of sacral intraosseous schwannomas forming a total of 29 cases examined. Conclusions Sacral intraosseous schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis for both radiologists and pathologists when dealing with large expansile, lytic lesions, with well-defined sclerotic margins involving the sacrum. This is particularly important in middle-aged adults presenting with pathology centered around S2-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.