Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29890642›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2018

Chemical Elicitors of Antibiotic Biosynthesis in Actinomycetes.

Anton P Tyurin, Vera A Alferova, Vladimir A Korshun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential ofMetabolites · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Modern Trends in Natural Antibiotic Discovery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anton P TyurinGause Institute of New Antibiotics, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya 11, 119021 Moscow, Russia. ap2rin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-6161
Vera A AlferovaGause Institute of New Antibiotics, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya 11, 119021 Moscow, Russia. alferovava@gmail.com.
Vladimir A KorshunGause Institute of New Antibiotics, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya 11, 119021 Moscow, Russia. v-korshun@yandex.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-9436-6561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing of actinomycetes has uncovered a new immense realm of microbial chemistry and biology. Most biosynthetic gene clusters present in genomes were found to remain “silent” under standard cultivation conditions. Some small molecules—chemical elicitors—can be used to induce the biosynthesis of antibiotics in actinobacteria and to expand the chemical diversity of secondary metabolites. Here, we outline a brief account of the basic principles of the search for regulators of this type and their application.

Indexed as

actinomycetesantibiotic biosynthesisHiTESsilent biosynthetic pathwaystranslation inhibitorsγ-butyrolactones

Identifiers

PMID29890642
PMCPMC6027282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.