Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29889886›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

φ-evo: A program to evolve phenotypic models of biological networks.

Adrien Henry, Mathieu Hemery, Paul François

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Systems Biology of Morphogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated, predictive, and interpretable inference ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrien HenryPhysics Department, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-3241
Mathieu HemeryPhysics Department, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2963-7067
Paul FrançoisPhysics Department, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-839X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular networks are at the core of most cellular decisions, but are often difficult to comprehend. Reverse engineering of network architecture from their functions has proved fruitful to classify and predict the structure and function of molecular networks, suggesting new experimental tests and biological predictions. We present φ-evo, an open-source program to evolve in silico phenotypic networks performing a given biological function. We include implementations for evolution of biochemical adaptation, adaptive sorting for immune recognition, metazoan development (somitogenesis, hox patterning), as well as Pareto evolution. We detail the program architecture based on C, Python 3, and a Jupyter interface for project configuration and network analysis. We illustrate the predictive power of φ-evo by first recovering the asymmetrical structure of the lac operon regulation from an objective function with symmetrical constraints. Second, we use the problem of hox-like embryonic patterning to show how a single effective fitness can emerge from multi-objective (Pareto) evolution. φ-evo provides an efficient approach and user-friendly interface for the phenotypic prediction of networks and the numerical study of evolution itself.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhenotypeSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic FitnessMice

Identifiers

PMID29889886
PMCPMC6013240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.