Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29889854›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Elucidating biogeographical patterns in Australian native canids using genome wide SNPs.

Kylie M Cairns, Laura M Shannon, Janice Koler-Matznick, J William O Ballard, Adam R Boyko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A global assessment of large terrestrial carnivore kill rates.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ancient genomes reveal over two thousand years of dingo population structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Australasian dingo archetype:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New Guinea highland wild dogs are the original New Guinea singing dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?Frontiers in zoology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kylie M CairnsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-2854
Laura M ShannonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Janice Koler-MatznickThe New Guinea Singing Dog Conservation Society, Central Point, Oregon, United States of America.
J William O BallardSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adam R BoykoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Cornell University · USUNSW Sydney · AUWildlife Conservation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dingoes play a strong role in Australia's ecological framework as the apex predator but are under threat from hybridization and agricultural control programs. Government legislation lists the conservation of the dingo as an important aim, yet little is known about the biogeography of this enigmatic canine, making conservation difficult. Mitochondrial and Y chromosome DNA studies show evidence of population structure within the dingo. Here, we present the data from Illumina HD canine chip genotyping for 23 dingoes from five regional populations, and five New Guinea Singing Dogs to further explore patterns of biogeography using genome-wide data. Whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data supported the presence of three distinct dingo populations (or ESUs) subject to geographical subdivision: southeastern (SE), Fraser Island (FI) and northwestern (NW). These ESUs should be managed discretely. The FI dingoes are a known reservoir of pure, genetically distinct dingoes. Elevated inbreeding coefficients identified here suggest this population may be genetically compromised and in need of rescue; current lethal management strategies that do not consider genetic information should be suspended until further data can be gathered. D statistics identify evidence of historical admixture or ancestry sharing between southeastern dingoes and South East Asian village dogs. Conservation efforts on mainland Australia should focus on the SE dingo population that is under pressure from domestic dog hybridization and high levels of lethal control. Further data concerning the genetic health, demographics and prevalence of hybridization in the SE and FI dingo populations is urgently needed to develop evidence based conservation and management strategies.

Indexed as

GenomePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsAustraliaCluster AnalysisConservation of Natural ResourcesDogsFemaleGenotypeHybridization, GeneticInbreedingMalePhylogenyPhylogeographyPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29889854
PMCPMC5995383
OpenAlexW2808221299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.