Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

Adaptation and validation of short scales for assessment of psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6.

Ahmad Hajebi, Abbas Motevalian, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar, Vandad Sharifi, Leila Hoseini, Behrang Shadloo, Ramin Mojtabai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad HajebiResearch Center for Addiction and Risky Behaviors (ReCARB), Psychiatric Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas MotevalianDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh Amin-EsmaeiliIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3888-3254
Afarin Rahimi-MovagharIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Vandad SharifiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila HoseiniIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behrang ShadlooIranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin MojtabaiDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aims of the study were to translate into Persian and culturally adapt the Kessler Psychological Distress Scales, K10 and K6, and to assess their reliability and validity.

methodThe sample was recruited from primary health care (PHC) settings by quota nonprobability sampling, stratified by sex and age. Validity was assessed against the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (v2.1). The psychometric properties of K6 and K10 were also compared with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).

resultsA total of 818 participants completed the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha were 0.92 and 0.87 for K6 and K10, respectively. Optimal cutoff scores for detecting any mood or anxiety disorder in the past 30 days were 15 for K10 and 10 for K6. At these cutoff points, the measures had sensitivities of 0.77 and 0.73, specificities of 0.74 and 0.78, and positive predictive values of 0.48 and 0.52, respectively. Psychometric properties of K10 and K6 were similar to GHQ-12.

conclusionPersian K10 and K6 have acceptable psychometric properties as screening instruments for common mental health conditions. Given its brevity and similar psychometric properties to the longer instruments, the Persian K6 appears to be a suitable scale for use in PHC settings and, possibly, epidemiologic studies in Iran.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentAdultAnxiety DisordersBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansIranMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress, PsychologicalKessler Psychological Distress Scalemental illnessPersianscreeningvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID29888523
PMCPMC6877187
OpenAlexW2808624202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.