Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888338›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2018

Validation of mobile phone text messages for nicotine and tobacco risk communication among college students: A content analysis.

Georges E Khalil, Karen S Calabro, Brittani Crook, Tamara C Machado, Cheryl L Perry, Alexander V Prokhorov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing risk and crisis communication with computational methods: A systematic literature review.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Applying Natural Language Processing to Evaluate News Media Coverage of Bullying and Cyberbullying.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georges E KhalilThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States.
Karen S CalabroThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States.
Brittani CrookThe University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Texas, United States.
Tamara C MachadoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States.
Cheryl L PerryThe University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Texas, United States.
Alexander V ProkhorovThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States.

Funding

Training & Education Core p335-350P50CA180906 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PERRY, CHERYL LEE · 2013 to 2017
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United States, young adults have the highest prevalence of tobacco use. The dissemination of mobile phone text messages is a growing strategy for tobacco risk communication among young adults. However, little has been done concerning the design and validation of such text messages. The Texas Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (Texas-TCORS) has developed a library of messages based on framing (gain- or loss-framed), depth (simple or complex) and appeal (emotional or rational). This study validated the library based on depth and appeal, identified text messages that may need improvement, and explored new themes.

methodsThe library formed the study sample (N=976 messages). The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software of 2015 was used to code for word count, word length and frequency of emotional and cognitive words. Analyses of variance, logistic regression and scatter plots were conducted for validation.

resultsIn all, 874 messages agreed with LIWC-coding. Several messages did not agree with LIWC. Ten messages designed to be complex indicated simplicity, while 51 messages designed to be rational exhibited no cognitive words. New relevant themes were identified, such as health (e.g. 'diagnosis', 'cancer'), death (e.g. 'dead', 'lethal') and social connotations (e.g. 'parents', 'friends').

conclusionsNicotine and tobacco researchers can safely use, for young adults, messages from the Texas-TCORS library to convey information in the intended style. Future work may expand upon the new themes. Findings will be utilized to develop new campaigns, so that risks of nicotine and tobacco products can be widely disseminated.

Indexed as

message framingnicotinerisk communicationtext messagetobaccovalidation

Identifiers

PMID29888338
PMCPMC5989570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.