ArticleVisceral medicine2018
Long-Term Outcomes after Surgery for Appendiceal Mucinous Tumours.
Article in Visceral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal Surgical Approaches for Incidentally Discovered Ruptured Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms.Cureus · 2024Article
- Concomitant occurrence of appendiceal mucocele and ulcerative colitis: Case reports.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings of LAMNs with peritoneal and splenic metastases: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Recurrence of initially localized appendiceal mucinous neoplasms after radical resection: survey analysis and literature review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- A rare case of a large low-grade appendicular mucinous neoplasm causing compressive symptoms.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN) Primarily Diagnosed as an Ovarian Mucinous Tumor.Case reports in surgery · 2021Article
- Survival of patients with resected primary colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: A competing risk nomogram analysis.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendiceal mucinous tumour (AMT) is a very uncommon disease. We aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative characteristics as well as long-term outcomes of patients with appendiceal mucinous adenomas and peritoneal pseudomyxoma (PMP).
methodsA consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with AMT were included in the study. Tumour recurrence and the development of PMP was diagnosed based on the patients' complaints, physical examination, imaging studies, and biopsy results. The calculation of survival rates was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsBetween January 2003 and February 2013, 25 patients had AMT. 15 patients underwent appendectomy only (60%), 5 patients (20%) right hemicolectomy, 4 patients (16%) cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and 1 patient (4%) appendectomy with caecal resection. Another 2 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC 4 days and 3 years, respectively, following initial appendectomy. In the histopathologic examination, adenoma was diagnosed in 12 patients (48%); among these, low-grade PMP was found in 1 patient (4%). Low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMCa) was diagnosed in 11 patients (44%); among these, low-grade PMP was found in seven cases (28%) and high-grade AMCa was diagnosed in 2 patients (8%). 2 of 8 PMP patients did not undergo CRS ± HIPEC because of comorbidities. The 5-year overall survival was 100% for the adenomas and 62% for PMP patients.
conclusionAMT is a very rare entity with a considerably good outcome even in disseminated disease. CRS and HIPEC is a gold standard treatment for PMP with excellent prognosis. However, our results could still be improved in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.