ArticleLiver cancer2018
A Phase I/Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Nintedanib versus Sorafenib in Asian Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Liver cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- FGFR as a Predictive Marker for Targeted Therapy in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Objective Response Predicts Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Systemic Therapies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of First Line Systemic Chemotherapy and Multikinase Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Nonsurgical management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical practice guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Guideline
- Hepatocellular carcinoma: signaling pathways and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Objective Response to Systemic Therapy Is a Strong Predictor of Overall Survival in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2024Article
- Survival Trends in Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Liver cancer · 2023Article
- Advancements in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Potential Preclinical Drugs and their Future.Current pharmaceutical design · 2023Review
- Small Molecule Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- An Insight into the Novel Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Systematic literature review of trials assessing recommended systemic treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatic oncology · 2022Review
- Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Updates and Outlook.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2022Review
- Selection of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Advances of Targeted Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Non-surgical management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review by Cancer Care Ontario.Canadian liver journal · 2021Review
- Novel systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology international · 2020Review
- First-line targ veted therapies of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2020Article
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nintedanib.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNintedanib is an oral, triple angiokinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor/platelet-derived growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptors. This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase I/II study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in terms of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and efficacy of nintedanib versus sorafenib in Asian patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND
methodsFor the phase I portion, patients were stratified into two groups according to their alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) and Child-Pugh score at baseline. For phase I, the primary endpoint was determination of the MTD in terms of DLTs. For phase II, patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5-6, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≤2, and an ALT/AST ≤2× the upper limit of normal were enrolled and randomized 2: 1 to nintedanib 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) (the MTD determined in phase I) or sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d. continuously in 28-day cycles until intolerable adverse events (AEs) or disease progression (PD); treatment beyond PD was allowed if clinical benefit was perceived. The primary endpoint for phase II was time to progression (TTP) by central independent review (CIR; by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.0); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS). All analyses were exploratory.
resultsThe MTD was 200 mg in both groups. For phase II, 95 patients were randomized to nintedanib (
conclusionsNintedanib showed numerically similar efficacy to sorafenib for CIR TTP and OS in Asian patients with advanced HCC and adequate liver function. AEs were generally manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.