ArticlePeerJ2018
Bioheat transfer model of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation-induced temperature changes.
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trans-Spinal Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Functional Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury: Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Correction · 2018-06-13Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Error in Text ·
- Retraction · 2018-08-10Copyright Claims · Lack of Approval from Third Party ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been extensively studied due to its promising application in motor function restoration. Many previous studies have explored both the essential mechanism of action and the methods for determining optimal stimulation parameters. In contrast, the bioheat transfer analysis of tSCS therapy has not been investigated to the same extent, despite widely existing, and being of great significance in assuring a stable and thermally safe treatment. In this paper, we concentrated on the thermal effects of tSCS using a finite element-based method. By coupling the electric field and bioheat field, systematic finite element simulations were performed on a human spinal cord model to survey the influence of anatomical structures, blood perfusion, and stimulation parameters on temperature changes for the first time. The results show that tSCS-induced temperature rise mainly occurs in the skin and fat layers and varies due to individual differences. The current density distribution along with the interactions of multiple biothermal effects synthetically determines the thermal status of the whole spinal cord model. Smaller stimulation electrodes have a higher risk of thermal damage when compared with larger electrodes. Increasing the stimulation intensity will result in more joule heat accumulation, hence an increase in the temperature. Among all configurations in this study that simulated the clinical tSCS protocols, the temperature rise could reach up to 9.4 °C on the skin surface depending on the stimulation parameters and tissue blood perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.