Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888109›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2018

Cetuximab combined with natural killer cells therapy: an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Shuzhen Liang, Mao Lin, Lizhi Niu, Kecheng Xu, Xiaohua Wang, Yingqing Liang, Mingjie Zhang, Duanming Du, Jibing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuzhen LiangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.
Mao LinDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.
Lizhi NiuDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.
Kecheng XuDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohua WangDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.
Yingqing LiangFuda Cancer Institute Guangzhou, China.
Mingjie ZhangHank Bioengineering Co., Ltd Shenzhen, China.
Duanming DuShenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Shenzhen, China.
Jibing ChenDepartment of Central Laboratory, Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells therapy has the potential to prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of cetuximab plus NK cells therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Between June 2015 and August 2016, 54 patients with advanced EGFR-expressing NSCLC were assigned randomly to the cetuximab plus NK cells therapy group (A; n = 27) or cetuximab alone group (B; n = 27). Patients in group A received two courses of NK cells therapy continuously. Cetuximab was administered intravenously and the weekly maintenance dose was continued until tumor progression. All adverse effects were manageable and no significant difference was noted between the two groups (

Indexed as

cetuximabclinical trialefficacynatural killer cellsNon-small cell lung cancersafety

Identifiers

PMID29888109
PMCPMC5992505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.