Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888090›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018

The Data Gap in the EHR for Clinical Research Eligibility Screening.

Alex Butler, Wei Wei, Chi Yuan, Tian Kang, Yuqi Si, Chunhua Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Principal Investigators' Perceptions on Factors Associated with Successful Recruitment in Clinical Trials.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A knowledge base of clinical trial eligibility criteria.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021
    Article
  14. Cognitive Function Characterization Using Electronic Health Records Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex ButlerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Wei WeiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Chi YuanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Tian KangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Yuqi SiThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLST35HL007616 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI RUDOLPH L LEIBEL, Markus Y Mapara · 1985 to 2026
$4.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007616NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much effort has been devoted to leverage EHR data for matching patients into clinical trials. However, EHRs may not contain all important data elements for clinical research eligibility screening. To better design research-friendly EHRs, an important step is to identify data elements frequently used for eligibility screening but not yet available in EHRs. This study fills this knowledge gap. Using the Alzheimer's disease domain as an example, we performed text mining on the eligibility criteria text in Clinicaltrials.gov to identify frequently used eligibility criteria concepts. We compared them to the EHR data elements of a cohort of Alzheimer's Disease patients to assess the data gap by usingthe OMOP Common Data Model to standardize the representations for both criteria concepts and EHR data elements. We identified the most common SNOMED CT concepts used in Alzheimer 's Disease trials, andfound 40% of common eligibility criteria concepts were not even defined in the concept space in the EHR dataset for a cohort of Alzheimer 'sDisease patients, indicating a significant data gap may impede EHR-based eligibility screening. The results of this study can be useful for designing targeted research data collection forms to help fill the data gap in the EHR.

Identifiers

PMID29888090
PMCPMC5961795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.