Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888072›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018

Deep Learning data integration for better risk stratification models of bladder cancer.

Olivier B Poirion, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Lana X Garmire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bladder Cancer and Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Applications.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multimodal analysis methods in predictive biomedicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A Survey of Autoencoder Algorithms to Pave the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivier B PoirionEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Kumardeep ChaudharyEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Lana X GarmireEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

Funding

Transgenic Mouse, ICSI and IVF CoreP20GM103457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WARD, WILLIAM S · 2012 to 2018
$12.9M
An Integrative Omics Approach to Identify Biomarkers Related to Preeclampsia and Breast Cancer RisksR01HD084633 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Cancer precision medicine through spatially informative single cell image and transcriptomics data analysisR01LM012373 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2016 to 2024
$2.4M
An Integrative Bioinformatics Approach to Study Single Cancer Cell HeterogeneityK01ES025434 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2014 to 2018
$905k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084633NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025434NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103457NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an unsupervised multi-omics integration pipeline, using deep-learning autoencoder algorithm, to predict the survival subtypes in bladder cancer (BC). We used TCGA dataset comprising mRNA, miRNA and methylation to infer two survival subtypes. We then constructed a supervised classification model to predict the survival subgroups of any new individual sample. Our training data gave two subgroups with significant survival differences (p-value=8e-4), where high-risk survival subgroup was enriched with KRT6/14 overexpression and PI3K-Akt pathways. We tested the robustness of model by randomly splitting the main dataset into multiple training and test folds, which gave overall significant p-values. Then, we successfully inferred the subtypes for a subset of samples kept as test dataset (p-value=0.03). We further applied our pipeline to predict the survival subgroups from another validation dataset with miRNA data (p-value=0.02). Conclusively, present pipeline is an effective approach to infer the survival subtype of a new sample, exemplified by BC.

Identifiers

PMID29888072
PMCPMC5961799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.