ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018
Provider Adoption of Speech Recognition and its Impact on Satisfaction, Documentation Quality, Efficiency, and Cost in an Inpatient EHR.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time Savings Through an AI Speech Assistant for Nursing Documentation: Pre-Post Time-Motion Study in German Long-Term Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An Exploration of Wearable Device Features Used in UK Hospital Parkinson Disease Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Benefits, barriers, and facilitators of using speech recognition technology in nursing documentation and reporting: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- A Framework for Augmented Intelligence in Allergy and Immunology Practice and Research-A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Health Informatics, Technology, and Education Committee.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022Article
- Preferences to improve rounding efficiency amongst hospitalists: a survey analysis.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2021Article
- Application of the i-PARIHS framework in the implementation of speech recognition technology as a way of addressing documentation burden within a mental health context.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
- Surgical Informatics: Defining the Role of Informatics in the Current Surgical Training Paradigm.Journal of surgical educationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study utilizes qualitative and quantitative methods to measure the adoption of speech recognition (SR) and its impact ON provider satisfaction, documentation quality, efficiency, and cost when used for clinical documentation within the electronic health record (EHR). Qualitative surveys gauged providers' expectations and experiences regarding documentation before and after SR implementation. A new methodology was developed to measure SR adoption as a proportion of total documentation volume. Quantitative data was collected from the EHR, medical transcription and SR solutions to measure SR adoption and cost savings. Study results revealed significant improvements in satisfaction, documentation quality, and efficiency among providers as a direct result of SR use. An improved provider experience correlated to an 81% reduction in monthly medical transcription costs, an increase from 20% to 77% in electronic clinical documentation adoption, and a 74% SR adoption rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29888069PMC5961784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.