ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018
Predicting the Outcome of Patient-Provider Communication Sequences using Recurrent Neural Networks and Probabilistic Models.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Conversational Agent for Weight Loss Counseling: Protocol for an Implementation and Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Review
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019Article
- Deep Neural Architectures for Discourse Segmentation in E-Mail Based Behavioral Interventions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- Identifying Effective Motivational Interviewing Communication Sequences Using Automated Pattern Analysis.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The problem of analyzing temporally ordered sequences of observations generated by molecular, physiological or psychological processes to make predictions about the outcome of these processes arises in many domains of clinical informatics. In this paper, we focus on predicting the outcome of patient-provider communication sequences in the context of the clinical dialog. Specifically, we consider prediction of the motivational interview success (i.e. eliciting a particular type of patient behavioral response) based on an observed sequence of coded patient-provider communication exchanges as a sequence classification problem. We propose two solutions to this problem, one that is based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and another that is based on Markov Chain (MC) and Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and compare the accuracy of these solutions using communication sequences annotated with behavior codes from the real-life motivational interviews. Our experiments indicate that the deep learning-based approach is significantly more accurate than the approach based on probabilistic models in predicting the success of motivational interviews (0.8677 versus 0.7038 and 0.6067 F1-score by RNN, MC and HMM, respectively, when using undersampling to correct for class imbalance, and 0.8381 versus 0.7775 and 0.7520 F1-score by RNN, MC and HMM, respectively, when using over-sampling). These results indicate that the proposed method can be used for real-time monitoring of progression of clinical interviews and more efficient identification of effective provider communication strategies, which in turn can significantly decrease the effort required to develop behavioral interventions and increase their effectiveness.
Identifiers
29888043PMC5961827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.