Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888043›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018

Predicting the Outcome of Patient-Provider Communication Sequences using Recurrent Neural Networks and Probabilistic Models.

Mehedi Hasan, Alexander Kotov, April Idalski Carcone, Ming Dong, Sylvie Naar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019
    Article
  4. Deep Neural Architectures for Discourse Segmentation in E-Mail Based Behavioral Interventions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehedi HasanDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Alexander KotovDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
April Idalski CarconeDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Ming DongDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Sylvie NaarDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

Automated Coding of eCoaching Exchanges to Promote Healthier EatingR21DK108071 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARCONE, APRIL MARIE IDALSKI, KOTOV, ALEXANDER · 2016 to 2017
$425k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK108071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of analyzing temporally ordered sequences of observations generated by molecular, physiological or psychological processes to make predictions about the outcome of these processes arises in many domains of clinical informatics. In this paper, we focus on predicting the outcome of patient-provider communication sequences in the context of the clinical dialog. Specifically, we consider prediction of the motivational interview success (i.e. eliciting a particular type of patient behavioral response) based on an observed sequence of coded patient-provider communication exchanges as a sequence classification problem. We propose two solutions to this problem, one that is based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and another that is based on Markov Chain (MC) and Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and compare the accuracy of these solutions using communication sequences annotated with behavior codes from the real-life motivational interviews. Our experiments indicate that the deep learning-based approach is significantly more accurate than the approach based on probabilistic models in predicting the success of motivational interviews (0.8677 versus 0.7038 and 0.6067 F1-score by RNN, MC and HMM, respectively, when using undersampling to correct for class imbalance, and 0.8381 versus 0.7775 and 0.7520 F1-score by RNN, MC and HMM, respectively, when using over-sampling). These results indicate that the proposed method can be used for real-time monitoring of progression of clinical interviews and more efficient identification of effective provider communication strategies, which in turn can significantly decrease the effort required to develop behavioral interventions and increase their effectiveness.

Identifiers

PMID29888043
PMCPMC5961827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.