ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018
Evaluating Generalizability of a Biospecimen Informatics Approach: Support for Local Requirements and Best Practices.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of an Integrated Clinical Research Informatics System for a Multi-Centre and Multi-Visit Prospective Birth Cohort Study.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2022Article
- Mapping Local Biospecimen Records to the OMOP Common Data Model.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- BioSCOOP - Biobank Sample Communication Protocol. New approach for the transfer of information between biobanks.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enable clinical and translational research, academic medical centers increasingly implement biospecimen information management systems. At our institution, one laboratory successfully implemented a multi-system solution that enabled collection and reporting of specimen- and aliquot-level data. The objective of this study was to assess the solution against the laboratory's requirements and with respect to support of best practices for biospecimen information management systems defined by the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER). The solution supported the laboratory's reporting needs and 90% (n=26) of ISBER best practices. To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first studies to demonstrate the generalizability of a biospecimen informatics approach. Findings suggest that development and evaluation of biospecimen informatics approaches can potentially improve through closer collaboration of informatics and biorepository professional societies.
Identifiers
29888041PMC5961803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.