Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888035›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2018

What's in a Note? Unpacking Predictive Value in Clinical Note Representations.

Willie Boag, Dustin Doss, Tristan Naumann, Peter Szolovits

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05176769 (The Usefulness of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Extraction and Processing of Clinical Data From Electronic Medical Records), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05176769 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Usefulness of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Extraction and Processing of Clinical Data From Electronic Medical Records (CardioMining-AI)

TypeobservationalSponsorAHEPA University HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled60,000ConditionsArtificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Electronic Medical Records
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CATAN: Chart-aware temporal attention network for adverse outcome prediction.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Willie BoagMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dustin DossMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tristan NaumannMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Peter SzolovitsMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING-MEDICAL INFORMATICS 90T15LM007092 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Nils Gehlenborg · 1992 to 2026
$32.8M
TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have seen a rapid increase in adoption during the last decade. The narrative prose contained in clinical notes is unstructured and unlocking its full potential has proved challenging. Many studies incorporating clinical notes have applied simple information extraction models to build representations that enhance a downstream clinical prediction task, such as mortality or readmission. Improved predictive performance suggests a "good" representation. However, these extrinsic evaluations are blind to most of the insight contained in the notes. In order to better understand the power of expressive clinical prose, we investigate both intrinsic and extrinsic methods for understanding several common note representations. To ensure replicability and to support the clinical modeling community, we run all experiments on publicly-available data and provide our code.

Identifiers

PMID29888035
PMCPMC5961801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.