ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Intra- and Inter-scanner Reliability of Scaled Subprofile Model of Principal Component Analysis on ALFF in Resting-State fMRI Under Eyes Open and Closed Conditions.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of resting-state brain activity between insomnia and generalized anxiety disorder: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.Brain imaging and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Abnormal alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and functional connectivity in insomnia patients with difficulty falling asleep: a resting-state fMRI study.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Evaluate the efficacy and reliability of functional gradients in within-subject designs.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Higher reliability and validity of Wavelet-ALFF of resting-state fMRI: From multicenter database and application to rTMS modulation.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- The Location Reliability of the Resting-State fMRI FC of Emotional Regions Towards rTMS Therapy.Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Test-retest reliability of peak location in the sensorimotor network of resting state fMRI for potential rTMS targets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Reliability and Validity of Power Spectrum Slope (PSS): A Metric for Measuring Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activity of Single Voxels.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Gray Matter Network Associated With Attention in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging progressive deformable registration based on a cascaded convolutional neural network.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Percent amplitude of fluctuation: A simple measure for resting-state fMRI signal at single voxel level.PloS one · 2020Article
- Abnormal Spontaneous Neural Activity of the Central Auditory System Changes the Functional Connectivity in the Tinnitus Brain: A Resting-State Functional MRI Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaled Subprofile Model of Principal Component Analysis (SSM-PCA) is a multivariate statistical method and has been widely used in Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Recently, SSM-PCA has been applied to discriminate patients with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls with Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) from Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RS-fMRI). As RS-fMRI scans are more readily available than PET scans, it is important to investigate the intra- and inter-scanner reliability of SSM-PCA in RS-fMRI. A RS-fMRI dataset with Eyes Open (EO) and Eyes Closed (EC) conditions was obtained in 21 healthy subjects (21.8 ± 1.8 years old, 11 females) on 3 visits (V1, V2, and V3), with V1 and V2 (mean interval of 14 days apart) on one scanner and V3 (about 8 months from V2) on a different scanner. To simulate between-group analysis in conventional SSM-PCA studies, 21 subjects were randomly divided into two groups, i.e., EC-EO group (EC ALFF map minus EO ALFF map,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.