Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29887727›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in immunology2018

Heterogeneity of Memory Marginal Zone B Cells.

Jacobus Hendricks, Nicolaas A Bos, Frans G M Kroese

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. B Cell Tolerance and Targeted Therapies in SLE.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Human IgMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  15. Resident Memory B Cells.Viral immunology · 2020
    Review
  16. Combined proinflammatory cytokine and cognate activation of invariant natural killer T cells enhances anti-DNA antibody responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacobus HendricksDiscipline of Human Physiology, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Nicolaas A BosDiscipline of Human Physiology, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Frans G M KroeseDiscipline of Human Physiology, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

Developing Research Innovation, Localization and Leadership in South Africa (DRILL)D43TW010131 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BRYSIEWICZ, PETRA, MOSHABELA, MOSA · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marginal zone (MZ) is largely composed of a unique subpopulation of B cells, the so-called MZ-B cells. At a molecular level, memory B cells are characterized by the presence of somatically mutated IGV genes. The earliest studies in the rat have documented the presence of hapten-specific MZ-B cells after immunization in the MZ. This work later received experimental support demonstrating that the IGHV-Cµ transcripts expressed by phenotypically defined splenic MZ-B cells (defined as CD90

Indexed as

AnimalsB-LymphocytesHumansImmunologic Memoryimmunoglobulin heavy (IGH) chain genesmarginal zone (MZ)memory B cellsratspleen

Identifiers

PMID29887727
PMCPMC5989013
OpenAlexW2801456344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.