ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018
Constructing Statistically Unbiased Cortical Surface Templates Using Feature-Space Covariance.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a Structurally Unbiased Brain Template with High Image Quality from MRI Scans of Saudi Adult Females.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The choice of surface template plays an important role in cross-sectional subject analyses involving cortical brain surfaces because there is a tendency toward registration bias given variations in inter-individual and inter-group sulcal and gyral patterns. In order to account for the bias and spatial smoothing, we propose a feature-based unbiased average template surface. In contrast to prior approaches, we factor in the sample population covariance and assign weights based on feature information to minimize the influence of covariance in the sampled population. The mean surface is computed by applying the weights obtained from an inverse covariance matrix, which guarantees that multiple representations from similar groups (e.g., involving imaging, demographic, diagnosis information) are down-weighted to yield an unbiased mean in feature space. Results are validated by applying this approach in two different applications. For evaluation, the proposed unbiased weighted surface mean is compared with un-weighted means both qualitatively and quantitatively (mean squared error and absolute relative distance of both the means with baseline). In first application, we validated the stability of the proposed optimal mean on a scan-rescan reproducibility dataset by incrementally adding duplicate subjects. In the second application, we used clinical research data to evaluate the difference between the weighted and unweighted mean when different number of subjects were included in control versus schizophrenia groups. In both cases, the proposed method achieved greater stability that indicated reduced impacts of sampling bias. The weighted mean is built based on covariance information in feature space as opposed to spatial location, thus making this a generic approach to be applicable to any feature of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.