Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29887658›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018

Phantom-based field maps for gradient nonlinearity correction in diffusion imaging.

Baxter P Rogers, Justin Blaber, Allen T Newton, Colin B Hansen, E Brian Welch, Adam W Anderson, Jeffrey J Luci, Carlo Pierpaoli, Bennett A Landman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping the Impact of Approximate Gradient Nonlinearity Fields Correction on Tractography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Consideration of Cerebrospinal Fluid Intensity Variation in Diffusion Weighted MRI.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  11. Mapping the Impact of Non-Linear Gradient Fields on Diffusion MRI Tensor Estimation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Baxter P RogersVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville TN USA.
Justin BlaberDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN USA.
Allen T NewtonVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville TN USA.
Colin B HansenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN USA.
E Brian WelchVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville TN USA.
Adam W AndersonDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN USA.
Jeffrey J LuciImaging Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX USA.
Carlo PierpaoliNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda MD USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville TN USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Processing and Analysis of Quantitative Diffusion MRI DataZIHEB000088 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI PIERPAOLI, CARLO · 2017 to 2022
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gradient coils in magnetic resonance imaging do not produce perfectly linear gradient fields. For diffusion imaging, the field nonlinearities cause the amplitude and direction of the applied diffusion gradients to vary over the field of view. This leads to site- and scan-specific systematic errors in estimated diffusion parameters such as diffusivity and anisotropy, reducing reliability especially in studies that take place over multiple sites. These errors can be substantially reduced if the actual scanner-specific gradient coil magnetic fields are known. The nonlinearity of the coil fields is measured by scanner manufacturers and used internally for geometric corrections, but obtaining and using the information for a specific scanner may be impractical for many sites that operate without special-purpose local engineering and research support. We have implemented an empirical field-mapping procedure using a large phantom combined with a solid harmonic approximation to the coil fields that is simple to perform and apply. Here we describe the accuracy and precision of the approach in reproducing manufacturer gold standard field maps and in reducing spatially varying errors in quantitative diffusion imaging for a specific scanner. Before correction, median B value error ranged from 33 - 41 relative to manufacturer specification at 100 mm from isocenter; correction reduced this to 0 - 4. On-axis spatial variation in the estimated mean diffusivity of an isotropic phantom was 2.2% - 4.1% within 60 mm of isocenter before correction, 0.5% - 1.6% after. Expected fractional anisotropy in the phantom was 0; highest estimated fractional anisotropy within 60 mm of isocenter was reduced from 0.024 to 0.012 in the phase encoding direction (48% reduction) and from 0.020 to 0.006 in the frequency encoding direction (72% reduction).

Indexed as

b-valuesgradient field nonlinearityMRIquantitative diffusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID29887658
PMCPMC5990280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.