Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29887322›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Early use of the HPV 2-dose vaccination schedule: Leveraging evidence to support policy for accelerated impact.

Vladimir Gilca, Jorge Salmerón-Castro, Chantal Sauvageau, Gina Ogilvie, Monique Landry, Monica Naus, Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vladimir GilcaQuebec Public Health Institute, Quebec, Canada; Laval University Research Hospital Center, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: vladimir.gilca@inspq.qc.ca.
Jorge Salmerón-CastroCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico; Unidad Académica en Investigación Epidemiológica, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.
Chantal SauvageauQuebec Public Health Institute, Quebec, Canada; Laval University Research Hospital Center, Quebec, Canada.
Gina OgilvieUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Monique LandryQuebec Ministry of Health and Social Services, Montreal, Canada.
Monica NausUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada.
Eduardo Lazcano-PonceCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were initially licensed based on efficacy after three-dose regimens in women aged 15-26 years, it was recognized early in clinical development that comparable immunogenicity could be obtained after just two doses when administered to younger girls. In both Canada and Mexico, public health authorities made the decision to administer two doses 6 months apart with a planned additional dose at 60 months, while simultaneously doing further study to determine if the third dose would confer meaningful additional benefit. This delayed third dose approach permitted a more cost-effective program with opportunities for improved compliance while minimizing injections and leaving open the opportunity to provide a full three-dose vaccination series. It required close cooperation across many governmental and civil society leadership bodies and real-time access to emerging data on HPV vaccine effectiveness. Although still limited, there is increasing evidence that even one-dose vaccination is sufficient to provide prolonged protection against HPV infection and associated diseases. Ongoing clinical trials and ecological studies are expected to consolidate existing data regarding one dose schedule use. However, to accelerate the preventive effect of HPV vaccination some jurisdictions, in particular those with limited resources may already consider the initiation of a one dose vaccination with the possibility of giving the second dose later in life if judged necessary. Such an approach would facilitate vaccination implementation and might permit larger catch-up vaccination programs in older girls (or as appropriate, girls and boys), thereby accelerating the impact on cervical cancer and other HPV-associated diseases.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryAdolescentAge FactorsCanadaChildClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMass VaccinationMexicoPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus VaccinesAlternative vaccination scheduleCervical cancerHPV vaccineHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Single dose

Identifiers

PMID29887322
PMCPMC6078939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.