Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29887307›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Division of Labor during Biofilm Matrix Production.

Anna Dragoš, Heiko Kiesewalter, Marivic Martin, Chih-Yu Hsu, Raimo Hartmann, Tobias Wechsler, Carsten Eriksen, Susanne Brix, Knut Drescher, Nicola Stanley-Wall and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AnResearch square · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Surfactin acceleratesBiofilm · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The extracytoplasmic sigma factor σScientific reports · 2025
    Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna DragošBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark; Terrestrial Biofilms Group, Institute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena 07743, Germany.
Heiko KiesewalterBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Marivic MartinBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark; Terrestrial Biofilms Group, Institute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena 07743, Germany.
Chih-Yu HsuSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Raimo HartmannMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg 35043, Germany.
Tobias WechslerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.
Carsten EriksenDisease Systems Immunology Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Susanne BrixDisease Systems Immunology Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Knut DrescherMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg 35043, Germany; Department of Physics, Philipps University, Marburg 35037, Germany.
Nicola Stanley-WallSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Rolf KümmerliDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.
Ákos T KovácsBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark; Terrestrial Biofilms Group, Institute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena 07743, Germany. Electronic address: atkovacs@dtu.dk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P001335/1European Research Council 681295European Research Council 716734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms as simple as bacteria can engage in complex collective actions, such as group motility and fruiting body formation. Some of these actions involve a division of labor, where phenotypically specialized clonal subpopulations or genetically distinct lineages cooperate with each other by performing complementary tasks. Here, we combine experimental and computational approaches to investigate potential benefits arising from division of labor during biofilm matrix production. We show that both phenotypic and genetic strategies for a division of labor can promote collective biofilm formation in the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis. In this species, biofilm matrix consists of two major components, exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and TasA. We observed that clonal groups of B. subtilis phenotypically segregate into three subpopulations composed of matrix non-producers, EPS producers, and generalists, which produce both EPSs and TasA. This incomplete phenotypic specialization was outperformed by a genetic division of labor, where two mutants, engineered as specialists, complemented each other by exchanging EPSs and TasA. The relative fitness of the two mutants displayed a negative frequency dependence both in vitro and on plant roots, with strain frequency reaching a stable equilibrium at 30% TasA producers, corresponding exactly to the population composition where group productivity is maximized. Using individual-based modeling, we show that asymmetries in strain ratio can arise due to differences in the relative benefits that matrix compounds generate for the collective and that genetic division of labor can be favored when it breaks metabolic constraints associated with the simultaneous production of two matrix components.

Indexed as

BiofilmsPhenotypeBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyModels, BiologicalPolysaccharides, BacterialSoil MicrobiologyBacterial Proteinsexopolysaccharide, BacillusPolysaccharides, BacterialTasA protein, Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilisbiofilmcompetitioncooperationdivision of laborEPSpelliclephenotypic heterogeneityplant colonizationTasA

Identifiers

PMID29887307
PMCPMC6331042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.