Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29887199›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2018

The effectiveness of pedicle screw immersion in vancomycin and ceftriaxone solution for the prevention of postoperative spinal infection: A prospective comparative study.

Burak Eren, Feyza Karagöz Güzey, Serkan Kitiş, Nezih Özkan, Cafer Korkut

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Burak ErenHealth Sciences University, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: drburakeren@hotmail.com.
Feyza Karagöz GüzeyHealth Sciences University, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: fkarag@yahoo.com.
Serkan KitişBezmi Alem University, Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: serkankitis@yahoo.com.
Nezih ÖzkanAcıbadem University Atakent Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: ozkannezih@hotmail.com.
Cafer KorkutHealth Sciences University, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: cafer.korkut@hotmail.com.
University of Health Science · KHAcıbadem University Atakent Hospital · TRBezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the local application of vancomycin hydrochloride (HCl)-ceftriaxone disodium hemiheptahydrate onto implants before using them to prevent postoperative infection.

methodsThe study included 239 patients (153 women and 86 men; mean age: 48.23 ± 16.77 years) who had thoracolumbar stabilization with transpedicular screws. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups. In the group 1 (n = 104), implants were bathed in a solution of local prophylactic antibiotics for 5 seconds just before implantation. In the group 2 (n = 135), implants were not bathed before implantation. Local antibiotics used in the study was effective against gram positive bacteria (including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram negative bacteria. The rate of surgical site infection and wound healing time were compared between the groups.

resultsA total of 10 patients (4.1%) had deep wound infection and 20 (8.4%) had superficial infection. The most common bacteria was Staphylococcus aureus. One patient died 21 days after the surgery because of sepsis. The wound healed in a mean of 9.66 ± 2.04 days in patients who had no infection and in 32.33 ± 19.64 days in patients with infection (p < 0.001). The patients in group 1 had significantly less deep infection than the patients in group 2 (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for superficial infection. Patients with vertebral fracture had significantly lower deep infection rate in group 1. The deep infection rate of group 1 patients with diabetes, with bleeding of more than 2000 mL, transfused with blood transfusions above 3 units and with dural injury was significantly lower than those in the group 2. None of the patients had allergic reactions to the drugs used for local prophylaxis.

conclusionsThis study shown that bathing implants in antibiotics solution was an effective local prophylactic method to prevent deep infections in spinal surgeries with instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCeftriaxoneFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresProspective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsSurgical Wound InfectionVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneVancomycinImplant associated infectionsLocal antibioticPrevent infectionProphylactic antibioticSpinal infectionSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID29887199
PMCPMC6150440
OpenAlexW2806341787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.