Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29885653›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2018

User-documented food consumption data from publicly available apps: an analysis of opportunities and challenges for nutrition research.

Marcus Maringer, Pieter Van't Veer, Naomi Klepacz, Muriel C D Verain, Anne Normann, Suzanne Ekman, Lada Timotijevic, Monique M Raats, Anouk Geelen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcus MaringerDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. m.maringer@seedmobi.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1914-5889
Pieter Van't VeerDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Naomi KlepaczFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Muriel C D VerainWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anne NormannDivision of Bioscience and Materials, Agrifood and Bioscience, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Suzanne EkmanDivision of Bioscience and Materials, Agrifood and Bioscience, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lada TimotijevicFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Monique M RaatsFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Anouk GeelenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Surrey · GBRISE Research Institutes of Sweden · SE

Funding

Horizon 2020 654280 (RICHFIELDS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for a better understanding of food consumption behaviour within its behavioural context has sparked the interest of nutrition researchers for user-documented food consumption data collected outside the research context using publicly available nutrition apps. The study aims to characterize the scientific, technical, legal and ethical features of this data in order to identify the opportunities and challenges associated with using this data for nutrition research.

methodA search for apps collecting food consumption data was conducted in October 2016 against UK Google Play and iTunes storefronts. 176 apps were selected based on user ratings and English language support. Publicly available information from the app stores and app-related websites was investigated and relevant data extracted and summarized. Our focus was on characteristics related to scientific relevance, data management and legal and ethical governance of user-documented food consumption data.

resultsFood diaries are the most common form of data collection, allowing for multiple inputs including generic food items, packaged products, or images. Standards and procedures for compiling food databases used for estimating energy and nutrient intakes remain largely undisclosed. Food consumption data is interlinked with various types of contextual data related to behavioural motivation, physical activity, health, and fitness. While exchange of data between apps is common practise, the majority of apps lack technical documentation regarding data export. There is a similar lack of documentation regarding the implemented terms of use and privacy policies. While users are usually the owners of their data, vendors are granted irrevocable and royalty free licenses to commercially exploit the data.

conclusionDue to its magnitude, diversity, and interconnectedness, user-documented food consumption data offers promising opportunities for a better understanding of habitual food consumption behaviour and its determinants. Non-standardized or non-documented food data compilation procedures, data exchange protocols and formats, terms of use and privacy statements, however, limit possibilities to integrate, process and share user-documented food consumption data. An ongoing research effort is required, to keep pace with the technical advancements of food consumption apps, their evolving data networks and the legal and ethical regulations related to protecting app users and their personal data.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood PreferencesMobile ApplicationsNutrition AssessmentResearchDietHumansContextual dataData managementDiet appsDietary intake assessmentFood consumption dataLegal and ethical governanceResearch infrastructureTechnological innovationsUser-documented data

Identifiers

PMID29885653
PMCPMC5994240
OpenAlexW2807019147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.