Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29885446›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2018

Spontaneous recovery after controlled cortical impact injury is not impeded by intermittent administration of the antipsychotic drug risperidone.

Lauren J Carlson, Gina C Bao, Sonya Besagar, Jacob B Leary, Hannah L Radabaugh, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren J CarlsonPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Gina C BaoPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Sonya BesagarPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Jacob B LearyPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Hannah L RadabaughPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Corina O BondiPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Anthony E KlinePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: klinae@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Effects of Chronic Adolescent Stress on Cognitive and Emotional Behavior After Adult TBIR21NS099674 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2017 to 2018
$429k
Multimodal Assessment of Behavioral flexibility after Frontal Brain TraumaR21NS099683 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Sustained Attention and Executive Functioning After Brain TraumaR03NS094950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060005NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084967NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS094950NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099674NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several preclinical studies have reported that daily administration of the antipsychotic drug (APD) risperidone (RISP) impedes recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, it is not known whether intermittent dosing would produce similar deleterious effects. The relevance of providing APDs intermittently is that not all patients in rehabilitation require daily treatments to manage TBI-induced agitation. Hence, the goal of the current study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent (vs. daily) administration of RISP would be less disturbing to motor and cognitive recovery after TBI. Anesthetized adult male rats were subjected to either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to groups receiving intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg) or RISP (0.45 mg/kg) 1x, 3x, or 7x per week until the completion of behavioral testing, which consisted of motor and cognitive assessments on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. The group receiving RISP 7x week exhibited greater motor and cognitive impairment compared to those receiving RISP 1x or 3x per week, or VEH [p<0.05]. Moreover, no differences were observed between the intermittent RISP groups vs. VEH [p>0.05], which supports the hypothesis. A potential clinical ramification is that RISP may be safe to manage agitation after TBI, but only when used sparingly.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebral CortexCognitionDrug Administration ScheduleMaleMaze LearningRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionRisperidoneAntipsychotic AgentsRisperidoneAntipsychoticsBeam-walkingBehaviorControlled cortical impactFunctional recoveryLearning and memoryMorris water mazeTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID29885446
PMCPMC6102063
OpenAlexW2806010091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.