Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29884821›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Phylodynamic assessment of intervention strategies for the West African Ebola virus outbreak.

Simon Dellicour, Guy Baele, Gytis Dudas, Nuno R Faria, Oliver G Pybus, Marc A Suchard, Andrew Rambaut, Philippe Lemey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative performance of viral landscape phylogeography approaches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling the velocity of evolving lineages and predicting dispersal patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Data integration in Bayesian phylogenetics.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon DellicourDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. simon.dellicour@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-1052
Guy BaeleDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-7732
Gytis DudasFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, 98109, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nuno R FariaDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Oliver G PybusDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Marc A SuchardDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Andrew RambautInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4337-3707
Philippe LemeyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-5353
Rega Institute for Medical Research · BEUniversity of Oxford · GBFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Merging Viral Genetics with Climate and Population Data for Zoonotic SurveillanceR01LM012080 · NLM · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SCOTCH, MATTHEW · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012080Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic analyses have provided important insights into Ebola virus spread during the recent West African outbreak, but their implications for specific intervention scenarios remain unclear. Here, we address this issue using a collection of phylodynamic approaches. We show that long-distance dispersal events were not crucial for epidemic expansion and that preventing viral lineage movement to any given administrative area would, in most cases, have had little impact. However, major urban areas were critical in attracting and disseminating the virus: preventing viral lineage movement to all three capitals simultaneously would have contained epidemic size to one-third. We also show that announcements of border closures were followed by a significant but transient effect on international virus dispersal. By quantifying the hypothetical impact of different intervention strategies, as well as the impact of barriers on dispersal frequency, our study illustrates how phylodynamic analyses can help to address specific epidemiological and outbreak control questions.

Indexed as

Africa, WesternDisease OutbreaksEbolavirusGenome, ViralGeographyHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansPhylogenyTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29884821
PMCPMC5993714
OpenAlexW2949365692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.