Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29884244›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

Insights into the ecology, evolution, and metabolism of the widespread Woesearchaeotal lineages.

Xiaobo Liu, Meng Li, Cindy J Castelle, Alexander J Probst, Zhichao Zhou, Jie Pan, Yang Liu, Jillian F Banfield, Ji-Dong Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaobo LiuLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Meng LiInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China. limeng848@szu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-0758
Cindy J CastelleDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, 336 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Alexander J ProbstDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, 336 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Zhichao ZhouLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Jie PanInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yang LiuInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Jillian F BanfieldDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, 336 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Ji-Dong GuLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, 999077, China. jdgu@hku.hk.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 3160010182National Natural Science Foundation of China 31622002National Natural Science Foundation of China 41506163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a recently discovered member of the DPANN superphylum, Woesearchaeota account for a wide diversity of 16S rRNA gene sequences, but their ecology, evolution, and metabolism remain largely unknown.

resultsHere, we assembled 133 global clone libraries/studies and 19 publicly available genomes to profile these patterns for Woesearchaeota. Phylogenetic analysis shows a high diversity with 26 proposed subgroups for this recently discovered archaeal phylum, which are widely distributed in different biotopes but primarily in inland anoxic environments. Ecological patterns analysis and ancestor state reconstruction for specific subgroups reveal that oxic status of the environments is the key factor driving the distribution and evolutionary diversity of Woesearchaeota. A selective distribution to different biotopes and an adaptive colonization from anoxic to oxic environments can be proposed and supported by evidence of the presence of ferredoxin-dependent pathways in the genomes only from anoxic biotopes but not from oxic biotopes. Metabolic reconstructions support an anaerobic heterotrophic lifestyle with conspicuous metabolic deficiencies, suggesting the requirement for metabolic complementarity with other microbes. Both lineage abundance distribution and co-occurrence network analyses across diverse biotopes confirmed metabolic complementation and revealed a potential syntrophic relationship between Woesearchaeota and methanogens, which is supported by metabolic modeling. If correct, Woesearchaeota may impact methanogenesis in inland ecosystems.

conclusionsThe findings provide an ecological and evolutionary framework for Woesearchaeota at a global scale and indicate their potential ecological roles, especially in methanogenesis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularArchaeaEcosystemGenome, ArchaealPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEcologyEvolutionMetabolismMethanogenSubgroupWoesearchaeota

Identifiers

PMID29884244
PMCPMC5994134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.