Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29884169›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Pregnant women's views on how to promote the use of a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening: a theory-informed qualitative study.

Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé, Matthew Menear, Michèle Dugas, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Hubert Robitaille, Anik M C Giguère, François Rousseau, Brenda J Wilson, France Légaré

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Women's Concerns and Experiences of Fetal Anomaly Screening Process: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Titilayo Tatiana AgbadjéCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew MenearCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.
Michèle DugasCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Samira Abbasgholizadeh RahimiCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.
Hubert RobitailleCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.
Anik M C GiguèreUniversité Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada.
François RousseauDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Brenda J WilsonSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
France LégaréCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-6696

Funding

Canadian Institute for Health Research GPH 129342Genome Canada GPH 129342Ministère de l'enseignement supérieur, de la recherche, de la science et de la technologie du Québec, Genome Alberta, and Genome BC GPH 129342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor pregnant women and their partners, the decision to undergo Down syndrome prenatal screening is difficult. Patient decision aids (PtDA) can help them make an informed decision. We aimed to identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that would be useful in an intervention to promote the use of a PtDA for Down syndrome prenatal screening, and to identify which of these BCTs pregnant women found relevant and acceptable.

methodsUsing the Behaviour Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. First, a group of experts from diverse professions, disciplines and backgrounds (eg. medicine, engineering, implementation science, community and public health, shared decision making) identified relevant BCTs. Then we recruited pregnant women consulting for prenatal care in three clinical sites: a family medicine group, a birthing centre (midwives) and a hospital obstetrics department in Quebec City, Canada. To be eligible, participants had to be at least 18 years old, having recently given birth or at least 16 weeks pregnant with a low-risk pregnancy, and have already decided about prenatal screening. We conducted three focus groups and asked questions about the relevance and acceptability of the BCTs. We analysed verbatim transcripts and reduced the BCTs to those the women found most relevant and acceptable.

resultsOur group of experts identified 25 relevant BCTs relating to information, support, consequences, others' approval, learning, reward, environmental change and mode of delivery. Fifteen women participated in the study with a mean age of 27 years. Of these, 67% (n = 10) were pregnant for the first time, 20% (n = 3) had difficulty making the decision to take the test, and 73% had made the decision with their partner. Of the 25 BCTs identified using the Behaviour Change Wheel, the women found the following 10 to be most acceptable and relevant: goal setting (behaviour), goal setting (results), problem solving, action plan, social support (general), social support (practical), restructuring the physical environment, prompts/cues, credible sources and modelling or demonstration of the behaviour.

conclusionsAn intervention to promote PtDA use among pregnant women for Down syndrome prenatal screening should incorporate the 10 BCTs identified.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAttitude to HealthBehavior TherapyDecision MakingDown SyndromeFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisProcedures and Techniques UtilizationQualitative ResearchBehaviour change techniquesBehaviour change wheelDown syndrome prenatal screeningInterventionPatient decision aidPregnant womenPromotionShared decision makingTheoretical domains frameworkTheory of planned behaviour

Identifiers

PMID29884169
PMCPMC5994018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.