Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29884123›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2018

Bacillus safensis FO-36b and Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032: a whole genome comparison of two spacecraft assembly facility isolates.

Madhan R Tirumalai, Victor G Stepanov, Andrea Wünsche, Saied Montazari, Racquel O Gonzalez, Kasturi Venkateswaran, George E Fox

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Education and public outreach: communicating science through storytelling.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024
    Article
  10. In Silico Safety Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genomic and Functional Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madhan R TirumalaiDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA.
Victor G StepanovDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA.
Andrea WünscheDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA.
Saied MontazariDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA.
Racquel O GonzalezDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA.
Kasturi VenkateswaranBiotechnology & Planetary Protection Group, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USA.
George E FoxDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA. fox@uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7767-8387
University of Houston · USJet Propulsion Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacillus strains producing highly resistant spores have been isolated from cleanrooms and space craft assembly facilities. Organisms that can survive such conditions merit planetary protection concern and if that resistance can be transferred to other organisms, a health concern too. To further efforts to understand these resistances, the complete genome of Bacillus safensis strain FO-36b, which produces spores resistant to peroxide and radiation was determined. The genome was compared to the complete genome of B. pumilus SAFR-032, and the draft genomes of B. safensis JPL-MERTA-8-2 and the type strain B. pumilus ATCC7061

resultsThe FO-36b gene order is essentially the same as that in SAFR-032 and other B. pumilus strains. The annotated genome has 3850 open reading frames and 40 noncoding RNAs and riboswitches. Of these, 307 are not shared by SAFR-032, and 65 are also not shared by MERTA and ATCC7061

conclusionsIt is not immediately obvious that the presence or absence of any specific gene or combination of genes is responsible for the variations in resistance seen. It is quite possible that distinctions in gene regulation can alter the expression levels of key proteins thereby changing the organism's resistance properties without gain or loss of a particular gene. What is clear is that phage elements contribute significantly to genome variability. Multiple genome comparison indicates that many strains named as B. pumilus likely belong to the B. safensis group.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBacillusBacillus pumilusBacterial ProteinsDNA GyraseGene OrderMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASpacecraftSpores, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDNA GyraseBacillus endosporesExtreme radiation resistanceGenome comparisonPeroxide resistancePhage insertionsPlanetary protection

Identifiers

PMID29884123
PMCPMC5994023
OpenAlexW2951311230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.