Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29883732›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Visuocortical changes during a freezing-like state in humans.

Maria Lojowska, Sam Ling, Karin Roelofs, Erno J Hermans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stretch-Induced Muscle Responses Under Threat Versus Safety.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Entangled Brain.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The association between serotonin transporter availability and the neural correlates of fear bradycardia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria LojowskaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: lojowska.maria@gmail.com.
Sam LingDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, USA.
Karin RoelofsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erno J HermansDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

How Does Normalization Regulate Visual Competition?R01EY028163 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SAM LING · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028163NIH HHS EY028163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An adaptive response to threat requires optimized detection of critical sensory cues. This optimization is thought to be aided by freezing - an evolutionarily preserved defensive state of immobility characterized by parasympathetically mediated fear bradycardia and regulated by the amygdala-periaqueductal grey (PAG) circuit. Behavioral observations in humans and animals have suggested that freezing is also a state of enhanced visual sensitivity, particularly for coarse visual information, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. We induced a freezing-like state in healthy volunteers using threat of electrical shock and measured threat-related changes in both stimulus-independent (baseline) and stimulus-evoked visuocortical activity to low-vs. high-spatial frequency gratings, using functional MRI. As measuring immobility is not feasible in MRI environments, we used fear bradycardia and amygdala-PAG coupling in inferring a freezing-like state. An independent functional localizer and retinotopic mapping were used to assess the retinotopic specificity of visuocortical modulations. We found a threat-induced increase in baseline (stimulus-independent) visuocortical activity that was retinotopically nonspecific, which was accompanied by increased connectivity with the amygdala. A positive correlation between visuocortical activity and fear bradycardia (while controlling for sympathetic activation), and a concomitant increase in amygdala-PAG connectivity, confirmed the specificity of these findings for the parasympathetically dominated freezing-like state. Visuocortical responses to gratings were retinotopically specific, but did not differ between threat and safe conditions across participants. However, individuals who exhibited better discrimination of low-spatial frequency stimuli showed reduced stimulus-evoked V1 responses under threat. Our findings suggest that a defensive state of freezing involves an integration of preparatory defensive and perceptual changes which may be regulated by a common mechanism involving the amygdala.

Indexed as

AdultAmygdalaBrain MappingFearFemaleFreezing Reaction, CatalepticHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePeriaqueductal GrayVisual CortexYoung AdultFear bradycardiaFreezingFunctional MRISpatial frequencyVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID29883732
PMCPMC6553455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.