Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29883637›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2018

Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia, Yousuf M Khalifa, Mark R Buckley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling the mechanobiology of cornea: From bench side to the clinic.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel A Ramirez-GarciaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: mramire6@ur.rochester.edu.
Yousuf M KhalifaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark R BuckleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal endothelial cell (CEC) loss occurs from tissue manipulation during anterior segment surgery and corneal transplantation as well as from contact with synthetic materials like intraocular lenses and tube shunts. While several studies have quantified CEC loss for specific surgical steps, the vulnerability of CECs to isolated, controllable and measurable mechanical forces has not been assessed previously. The purpose of this study was to develop an experimental testing platform where the susceptibility of CECs to controlled mechanical trauma could be measured. The corneal endothelial surfaces of freshly dissected porcine corneas were subjected to a range of indentation forces via a spherical stainless steel bead. A cell viability assay in combination with high-resolution fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize and quantify injured/dead CEC densities before and after mechanical loading. In specimens subjected to an indentation force of 9 mN, the mean ± SD peak contact pressure P

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesMicroscopy, FluorescenceStress, MechanicalAnimalsCell CountCell SurvivalCorneal Endothelial Cell LossEndothelium, CornealEye InjuriesMicrospheresSwineWounds, NonpenetratingCataract surgeryCorneal endothelial cell densityCorneal endothelial cell lossCorneal endotheliumMechanical traumaSurgical trauma

Identifiers

PMID29883637
PMCPMC6497073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.