Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29883528›Full record

ReviewJournal of midwifery & women's health2018

The Causal Inference Framework: A Primer on Concepts and Methods for Improving the Study of Well-Woman Childbearing Processes.

Ellen L Tilden, Jonathan M Snowden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ellen L Tilden
Jonathan M Snowden

Funding

Scholars in Women's Health Research Across the LifespanK12HD043488 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MYATT, LESLIE · 2002 to 2023
$10.4M
Cesarean delivery in overweight and obese women: patient and systems factorsR00HD079658 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SNOWDEN, JONATHAN M · 2016 to 2018
$725k
Cesarean delivery in overweight and obese women: patient and systems factorsK99HD079658 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SNOWDEN, JONATHAN M · 2014 to 2015
$222k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043488NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD079658NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD094535NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD079658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The causal inference framework and related methods have emerged as vital within epidemiology. Scientists in many fields have found that this framework and a variety of designs and analytic approaches facilitate the conduct of strong science. These approaches have proven particularly important for catalyzing knowledge development using existing data and addressing questions for which randomized clinical trials are neither feasible nor ethical. The study of healthy women and normal childbearing processes may benefit from more direct and deliberate engagement with the process of inferring causes and, further, may be strengthened through use of methods appropriate for this undertaking. The purpose of this primer, the first in a series of 3 articles, is to provide the reader an introduction to concepts and methods relevant for causal inference, aimed at the clinician scientist and offer details and references supporting further application of epidemiologic knowledge. The causal inference framework and associated methods hold promise for generating strong, broadly representative, and actionable science to improve the outcomes of healthy women during the childbearing cycle and their children.

Indexed as

CausalityConcept FormationDelivery, ObstetricEpidemiologic MethodsKnowledgeNatural ChildbirthResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansParturitionPregnancyPregnancy Complicationscausal inference frameworkdirected acyclic graphsmidwifery scienceobservational studiesphysiologic childbearing scienceprimerpropensity score analysissecondary data analysis

Identifiers

PMID29883528
PMCPMC6235714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.