Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29883451›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory.

Nichol Castro, Joshua M Mendoza, Elizabeth C Tampke, Michael S Vitevitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phonological but not semantic influences on the speech-to-song illusion.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nichol CastroSpoken Language Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Joshua M MendozaSpoken Language Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Elizabeth C TampkeSpoken Language Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Michael S VitevitchSpoken Language Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-0838

Funding

TRAINING RESEARCHERS IN LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENTST32DC000052 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI RICE, MABEL L · 1995 to 2022
$2.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Speech-to-Song Illusion, repetition of a spoken phrase results in it being perceived as if it were sung. Although a number of previous studies have examined which characteristics of the stimulus will produce the illusion, there is, until now, no description of the cognitive mechanism that underlies the illusion. We suggest that the processes found in Node Structure Theory that are used to explain normal language processing as well as other auditory illusions might also account for the Speech-to-Song Illusion. In six experiments we tested whether the satiation of lexical nodes, but continued priming of syllable nodes may lead to the Speech-to-Song Illusion. The results of these experiments provide evidence for the role of priming, activation, and satiation as described in Node Structure Theory as an explanation of the Speech-to-Song Illusion.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleMusicSatiationSpeechStudents

Identifiers

PMID29883451
PMCPMC5993277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.