Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29883265›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2019

The enteric microbiota regulates jejunal Paneth cell number and function without impacting intestinal stem cells.

Alexi A Schoenborn, Richard J von Furstenberg, Smrithi Valsaraj, Farah S Hussain, Molly Stein, Michael T Shanahan, Susan J Henning, Ajay S Gulati

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Adiponectin Regulated by Indole-3-Acetic Acid in Paneth Cells Controls Renewal and Differentiation of Gut Stem Cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract: Friend or foe?World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexi A Schoenborna Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Richard J von Furstenberga Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Smrithi Valsaraja Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Farah S Hussaina Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Molly Steina Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Michael T Shanahana Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Susan J Henninga Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
Ajay S Gulatia Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC 27599 , USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource CenterP40OD010995 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ryan B Sartor · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU01DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2009 to 2018
$6.5M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU24DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Collaborative Approaches to the Study of Intestinal Epithelial Stem CellsU01DK085547 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENNING, SUSAN J. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
Paneth cell dysfunction and gut dysbiosis in experimental intestinal inflammationK08DK095917 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GULATI, AJAY S · 2012 to 2014
$463k
Influences of the enteric microbiota on intestinal stem cell biologyR03DK104005 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GULATI, AJAY S · 2015 to 2016
$152k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK095917NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK104005NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085532NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085547NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK085532NIH HHS P40 OD010995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paneth cells (PCs) are epithelial cells found in the small intestine, next to intestinal stem cells (ISCs) at the base of the crypts. PCs secrete antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that regulate the commensal gut microbiota. In contrast, little is known regarding how the enteric microbiota reciprocally influences PC function. In this study, we sought to characterize the impact of the enteric microbiota on PC biology in the mouse small intestine. This was done by first enumerating jejunal PCs in germ-free (GF) versus conventionally raised (CR) mice. We next evaluated the possible functional consequences of altered PC biology in these experimental groups by assessing epithelial proliferation, ISC numbers, and the production of AMPs. We found that PC numbers were significantly increased in CR versus GF mice; however, there were no differences in ISC numbers or cycling activity between groups. Of the AMPs assessed, only Reg3γ transcript expression was significantly increased in CR mice. Intriguingly, this increase was abrogated in cultured CR versus GF enteroids, and could not be re-induced with various bacterial ligands. Our findings demonstrate the enteric microbiota regulates PC function by increasing PC numbers and inducing Reg3γ expression, though the latter effect may not involve direct interactions between bacteria and the intestinal epithelium. In contrast, the enteric microbiota does not appear to regulate jejunal ISC census and proliferation. These are critical findings for investigators using GF mice and the enteroid system to study PC and ISC biology.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell CountCell ProliferationFemaleGerm-Free LifeIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallMice, Inbred C57BLMultipotent Stem CellsPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsPaneth CellsTranscription, GeneticAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsReg3g protein, mouseenteroidgerm-freeintestinal stem cellmicrobiotaPaneth cellReg3γ

Identifiers

PMID29883265
PMCPMC6363071
OpenAlexW2806807750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.