Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882850›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Asthma among World Trade Center First Responders: A Qualitative Synthesis and Bias Assessment.

Hyun Kim, Navneet Kaur Baidwan, David Kriebel, Manuel Cifuentes, Sherry Baron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyun KimDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. kimx4804@umn.edu.
Navneet Kaur BaidwanDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. navneetbaidwaan@gmail.com.
David KriebelDepartment of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA. david_kriebel@uml.edu.
Manuel CifuentesDepartment of Public Health, Regis College, Weston, MA 02493, USA. manuel.cifuentes@regiscollege.edu.
Sherry BaronBarry Commoner Center for Health & the Environment, Queens College, New York, NY 11367, USA. sherrybaron@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-1458

Funding

Health and Socioeconomic Sequelae of the WTC Disaster Among RespondersU01OH010399 · OH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI MOLINE, JACQUELINE · 2012 to 2013
$998k
NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH010399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Trade Center (WTC) disaster exposed the responders to several hazards. Three cohorts i.e., the Fire Department of New York (FDNY), the General Responder Cohort (GRC), and the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR) surveyed the exposed responder population. We searched Pubmed and Web of Science for literature on a well-published association between the WTC exposures and asthma, focusing on new-onset self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma. The resulting five articles were qualitatively assessed for potential biases. These papers were independently reviewed by the co-authors, and conclusions were derived after discussions. While, the cohorts had well-defined eligibility criteria, they lacked information about the entire exposed population. We conclude that selection and surveillance biases may have occurred in the GRC and WTCHR cohorts, but were likely to have been minimal in the FDNY cohort. Health care benefits available to responders may have increased the reporting of both exposure and outcome in the former, and decreased outcome reporting in the FDNY cohort. Irrespective of the biases, the studies showed similar findings, confirming the association between WTC exposure and self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma among responders. This suggests that health data gathered under great duress and for purposes other than epidemiology can yield sound conclusions. Potential biases can, however, be minimized by having validated survey instruments and worker registries in place before events occur.

Indexed as

BiasSeptember 11 Terrorist AttacksAdultAsthmaDisastersEmergency RespondersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkNew York CityOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthRegistriesbias analysisnew-onset asthmarespondersreviewworld trade center

Identifiers

PMID29882850
PMCPMC6025114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.