Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882833›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Psychometric Evaluation of the Team Member Perspectives of Person-Centered Care (TM-PCC) Survey for Long-Term Care Homes.

Veronique M Boscart, Meaghan Davey, Jenny Ploeg, George Heckman, Sherry Dupuis, Linda Sheiban, Jessica Luh Kim, Paul Brown, Souraya Sidani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronique M BoscartSchlegel Centre for Advancing Seniors Care, 299 Doon Valley Drive, Kitchener, ON N2G 4M4, Canada. vboscart@conestogac.on.ca.
Meaghan DaveySchlegel Centre for Advancing Seniors Care, 299 Doon Valley Drive, Kitchener, ON N2G 4M4, Canada. zehrm1@mcmaster.ca.
Jenny PloegSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. ploegj@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8168-8449
George HeckmanSchlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging, 250 Laurelwood Drive, Waterloo, ON N2J 0E2, Canada. ggheckma@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-3287
Sherry DupuisFaculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada. sldupuis@uwaterloo.ca.
Linda SheibanSchlegel Centre for Advancing Seniors Care, 299 Doon Valley Drive, Kitchener, ON N2G 4M4, Canada. lsheiban@conestogac.on.ca.
Jessica Luh KimSchlegel Villages, 325 Max Becker Dr, Kitchener, ON N2E 4H5, Canada. Jessica.luhkim@schlegelvillages.com.
Paul BrownSchlegel Villages, 325 Max Becker Dr, Kitchener, ON N2E 4H5, Canada. paul.brown@schlegelvillages.com.
Souraya SidaniDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada. ssidani@ryerson.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Person-centered care (PCC) is fundamental for providing high-quality care in long-term care homes. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of an 11-item Team Member Perspectives of Person-Centered Care (TM-PCC) survey, adapted from White and colleagues (2008). In a cross-sectional study, 461 staff from four long-term care homes in Ontario, Canada, completed the TM-PCC. Construct validity and internal consistency of the TM-PCC were examined with a principal component analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Findings revealed a three-component structure with factor 1, Supporting Social Relationships; factor 2, Familiarity with Residents’ Preferences; and factor 3, Meaningful Resident⁻Staff Relationships. The TM-PCC, as compared to the original survey, presented with less components (i.e., did not address Resident Autonomy, Personhood, Comfort, Work with Residents, Personal Environment, and Management Structure), yet included one new component (Meaningful Resident⁻Staff Relationships). The TM-PCC has a similar internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient 0.82 vs. White et al. 0.74⁻0.91). The TM-PCC can be used to assess PCC from the staff’s perspective in long-term care homes.

Indexed as

care qualitylong-term carelong-term care homesmeasurementperson-centered carepsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID29882833
PMCPMC6023483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.