ReviewCells2018
Nanopipettes as Monitoring Probes for the Single Living Cell: State of the Art and Future Directions in Molecular Biology.
Review in Cells, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opto-Electrochemical Probes for In Vitro/In Vivo Analysis: Principles, Designs, and Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Applications of Nanopipettes in Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy for High-Spatial-Resolution Topographic Imaging and Sensing in Single Cells.ACS measurement science au · 2026Review
- Super-resolution imaging with nanopipettes.Npj imaging · 2025Article
- Nanopipettes as a Potential Diagnostic Tool for Selective Nanopore Detection of Biomolecules.Biosensors · 2024Review
- An Insulin-Modified pH-Responsive Nanopipette Based on Ion Current Rectification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- The Most Recent Advances in the Application of Nano-Structures/Nano-Materials for Single-Cell Sampling.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Nanopipette/Nanorod-Combined Quartz Tuning Fork⁻Atomic Force Microscope.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Analytical and Quantitative in Vivo Monitoring of Brain Neurochemistry by Electrochemical and Imaging Approaches.ACS omega · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Examining the behavior of a single cell within its natural environment is valuable for understanding both the biological processes that control the function of cells and how injury or disease lead to pathological change of their function. Single-cell analysis can reveal information regarding the causes of genetic changes, and it can contribute to studies on the molecular basis of cell transformation and proliferation. By contrast, whole tissue biopsies can only yield information on a statistical average of several processes occurring in a population of different cells. Electrowetting within a nanopipette provides a nanobiopsy platform for the extraction of cellular material from single living cells. Additionally, functionalized nanopipette sensing probes can differentiate analytes based on their size, shape or charge density, making the technology uniquely suited to sensing changes in single-cell dynamics. In this review, we highlight the potential of nanopipette technology as a non-destructive analytical tool to monitor single living cells, with particular attention to integration into applications in molecular biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.