Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882174›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2018

Numerical optimization of coordinated reset stimulation for desynchronizing neuronal network dynamics.

Shigeru Kubota, Jonathan E Rubin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shigeru KubotaGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yonezawa, Yamagata, 992-8510, Japan. kubota@yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp.
Jonathan E RubinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, 301 Thackeray Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive synchronization in neural activity is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). A promising technique for treating PD is coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation in which a neural population is desynchronized by the delivery of spatially-distributed current stimuli using multiple electrodes. In this study, we perform numerical optimization to find the energy-optimal current waveform for desynchronizing neuronal network with CR stimulation, by proposing and applying a new optimization method based on the direct search algorithm. In the proposed optimization method, the stimulating current is described as a Fourier series, and each Fourier coefficient as well as the stimulation period are directly optimized by evaluating the order parameter, which quantifies the synchrony level, from network simulation. This direct optimization scheme has an advantage that arbitrary changes in the dynamical properties of the network can be taken into account in the search process. By harnessing this advantage, we demonstrate the significant influence of externally applied oscillatory inputs and non-random network topology on the efficacy of CR modulation. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of brain stimulation for desynchronization may depend on various factors modulating the dynamics of the target network. We also discuss the possible relevance of the results to the efficacy of the stimulation in PD treatment.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, TheoreticalNonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsElectric StimulationFourier AnalysisHumansNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsSynapsesTime FactorsBrain stimulationCoordinated resetNumerical optimizationParkinson’s diseaseSynchronization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.