Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882160›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

FDG PET/CT imaging in detecting and guiding management of invasive fungal infections: a retrospective comparison to conventional CT imaging.

A P Douglas, K A Thursky, L J Worth, E Drummond, A Hogg, R J Hicks, M A Slavin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. OesophagealMedical mycology case reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Disseminated candidiasis on FDG-PET/CT.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. "Mushroom in the heart": aFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. FDG-PET/CT of COVID-19 and Other Lung Infections.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A P DouglasDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. abby.douglas@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-352X
K A ThurskyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
L J WorthDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
E DrummondCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
A HoggCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
R J HicksUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
M A SlavinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common in immunocompromised patients. While early diagnosis can reduce otherwise high morbidity and mortality, conventional CT has suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. Small studies have suggested that the use of FDG PET/CT may improve the ability to detect IFI. The objective of this study was to describe the proven and probable IFIs detected on FDG PET/CT at our centre and compare the performance with that of CT for localization of infection, dissemination and response to therapy.

methodsFDG PET/CT reports for adults investigated at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre were searched using keywords suggestive of fungal infection. Chart review was performed to describe the risk factors, type and location of IFIs, indication for FDG PET/CT, and comparison with CT for the detection of infection, and its dissemination and response to treatment.

resultsBetween 2007 and 2017, 45 patients had 48 proven/probable IFIs diagnosed prior to or following FDG PET/CT. Overall 96% had a known malignancy with 78% being haematological. FDG PET/CT located clinically occult infection or dissemination to another organ in 40% and 38% of IFI patients, respectively. Of 40 patients who had both FDG PET/CT and CT, sites of IFI dissemination were detected in 35% and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Of 18 patents who had both FDG PET/CT and CT follow-up imaging, there were discordant findings between the two imaging modalities in 11 (61%), in whom normalization of FDG avidity of a lesion suggested resolution of active infection despite a residual lesion on CT.

conclusionFDG PET/CT was able to localize clinically occult infection and dissemination and was particularly helpful in demonstrating response to antifungal therapy.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsFemaleHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsFluorodeoxyglucose F18CancerComputed tomographyDiagnosisInvasive fungal infectionsPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID29882160
OpenAlexW2807392499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.