Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882159›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Christopher W Ives, Wael A AlJaroudi, Vineeta Kumar, Ayman Farag, Dana V Rizk, Suzanne Oparil, Ami E Iskandrian, Fadi G Hage

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher W IvesUniversity of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-7784
Wael A AlJaroudiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Vineeta KumarDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ayman FaragDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Dana V RizkDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Suzanne OparilDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Ami E IskandrianDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Fadi G HageDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. fadihage@uab.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNoninvasive stress testing is commonly performed as part of pre-renal transplantation (RT) evaluation. We evaluated the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-myocardial perfusion, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart rate response (HRR)-post-RT.

methodsConsecutive RT recipients were identified at our institution. MPI was considered abnormal when there was a perfusion defect or reduced ejection fraction. HRR to vasodilator stress was calculated as percentage change from baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) post-RT; all-cause mortality was the secondary endpoint.

resultsAmong 1189 RT recipients, 819 (69%) underwent MPI. Of those, 182 (22%) had abnormal MPI, and 31 (4%) underwent CR pre-RT. During a median follow-up of 56 months post-RT, the annual CV event and mortality rates for patients who had no MPI, normal MPI and abnormal MPI were 1.5%, 3.1% and 4.3% (p < 0.001), and 1.8%, 2.6% and 3.6% (p = 0.016), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, compared to patients without MPI, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CV events for normal and abnormal MPI were 1.47 ([0.93-2.33], p = 0.1) and 1.78 ([1.03-3.06], p = 0.04). Blunted HRR was an independent predictor of CV events (HR = 1.73 [1.04-2.86], p = 0.034) and all-cause death (HR = 2.26 [1.28-3.98], p = 0.005) after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR pre-RT had annual mortality rates similar to those with no or normal MPI (1.9% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.2), while those who did not undergo CR had higher annual mortality (4% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.003).

conclusionsOne in five RT recipients who underwent screening MPI had an abnormal study, an independent predictor of CV events. A blunted HRR to vasodilator stress was associated with increased risk of CV events and death, even after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR were at low risk of mortality following RT. MPI is a useful tool to aid in risk stratification pre-RT.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationMyocardial Perfusion ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPrognosisStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeKidney transplantationMyocardial perfusion imagingOutcomesPost-transplantationRenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID29882159
OpenAlexW2805963841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.