ArticleDysphagia2019
Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Hebrew-Speaking Patients.
Article in Dysphagia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI)-Normative Values. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dysphagia · 2021Pooled it
- Psychometric Properties of Dysphagia Handicap Index Scale for Older Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in China.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Dysphagia Handicap Index in Bangladesh.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Impact of Modified Diet, Swallowing Exercises, and Electrostimulation on Quality of Life of Older Patients Suffering from Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Polish-Speaking Patients.Dysphagia · 2023Article
- Translation and Validation of the Tamil Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Tamil-Speaking Patients.Cureus · 2023Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index (I-DHI).Dysphagia · 2022Article
- The Quality of Life in Citizens with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia-A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Usefulness of the Korean Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index: Reliability, Validity, and Role as a Screening Test.Dysphagia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) is a 25-item questionnaire assessing the physical, functional, and emotional aspects of dysphagia patients' quality of life (QoL). The study goal was to translate and validate the Hebrew-DHI. 148 patients undergoing fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in two specialized dysphagia clinics between February and August 2017 filled the Hebrew-DHI and self-reported their dysphagia severity on a scale of 1-7. 21 patients refilled the DHI during a 2-week period following their first visit. FEES were scored for residue (1 point per consistency), penetration and aspiration (1 point for penetration, 2 points for aspiration, per consistency). 51 healthy volunteers also filled the DHI. Internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility were used for reliability testing. Validity was established by comparing DHI scores of dysphagia patients and healthy controls. Concurrent validity was established by correlating the DHI score with the FEES score. Internal consistency of the Hebrew-DHI was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as was the test-retest reproducibility (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001). The Hebrew-DHI's total score, and its three subscales (physical/functional/emotional) were significantly higher in dysphagia patients compared to those in healthy controls (median 38 pts, IQR 18-56 for dysphagia patients compared to 0, IQR 0-2 for healthy controls, p < 0.0001). A strong correlation was observed between the DHI score and the self-reported dysphagia severity measure (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.88, p < 0.0001). A moderate correlation was found between the DHI score and the FEES score (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.245, p = 0.003). The Hebrew-DHI is a reliable and valid questionnaire assessing dysphagia patients' QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29882103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.