Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882094›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2018

Antimicrobial Resistance to Agents Used for Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization: Is There a Reason for Concern?

Gregory R Madden, Costi D Sifri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A tale of two intensive care units (ICUs): BaselineInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Surgical Site Infection in Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Reduced Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine amongAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Discovery ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Decolonization ofJournal of healthcare engineering · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory R MaddenDivision of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Costi D SifriDivision of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA. csifri@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASES TRAINING PROGRAMT32AI007046 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Alison K Criss, William A Petri · 1985 to 2026
$15.3M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and mupirocin are increasingly used for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization to prevent healthcare-associated infections; however, increased use of these agents has led to concerns for growing resistance and reduced efficacy. In this review, we describe current understanding of reduced susceptibility to CHG and mupirocin in S. aureus and their potential clinical implications. RECENT

findingsWhile emergence of S. aureus tolerant or resistant to topical antimicrobial agents used for decolonization is well described, the clinical impact of reduced susceptibility is not clear. Important challenges are that standardized methods of resistance testing and interpretation are not established, and the risk for selection for co- or cross-resistance using universal, as opposed to targeted decolonization, is unclear. Evidence continues to support S. aureus decolonization in certain patient groups, although further studies are needed to determine the long-term impact of CHG and mupirocin resistance on efficacy. Strategies to mitigate further development of reduced susceptibility and the consequences of selection pressures through universal decolonization on resistance will benefit from further investigation.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceAntisepticChlorhexidineDecolonizationMupirocinStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID29882094
PMCPMC7015675
OpenAlexW2806925494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.