ArticleBehavior genetics2018
Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
Article in Behavior genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reviewing the association between motor competence and physical activity from a behavioral genetic perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Loneliness and depression: bidirectional mendelian randomization analyses using data from three large genome-wide association studies.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- ADHD and Student Grades in Children from the ABCD StudyBehavior genetics · 2026Article
- Personality and mental health as mediators linking childhood maltreatment to intimate partner violence victimization: a Mendelian randomization-direction of causation twin study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Measurement Error and Power in Family-Based Extensions to Mendelian Randomization.Behavior genetics · 2025Article
- Analysis of spermidine's effect on coronary heart disease risk using bidirectional Mendelian randomization and LC-MS/MS.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Causal Analyses of Associations Between Brain Structure and Suicide Attempt in Adulthood and Late Childhood.JAACAP open · 2025Article
- Twin pair analysis uncovers links between DNA methylation, mitochondrial DNA quantity and obesity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A robust and powerful GWAS method for family trios supporting within-family Mendelian randomization analysis.Research square · 2025Article
- Understanding Heritable Variation Among Hosts in Infectious Diseases Through the Lens of Twin Studies.Genes · 2025Review
- A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study of Tea-Drinking Habits and Risk of Elevated Serum Uric Acid Levels.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Article
- Unidirectional and bidirectional causation between smoking and blood DNA methylation: evidence from twin-based Mendelian randomisation.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Heritability of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers: A nuclear twin family design.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Unidirectional and Bidirectional Causation between Smoking and Blood DNA Methylation: Evidence from Twin-based Mendelian Randomisation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Do Children Cause the Cognitive Stimulation they Receive? Modelling the Direction of Causality.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- The genetic landscape of substance use disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- A Note on Modelling Bidirectional Feedback Loops in Mendelian Randomization Studies.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- Depression and risk of arthritis: A Mendelian randomization study.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- The Challenges and Opportunities for Mental Health Twin Research in Nigeria.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although experimental studies are regarded as the method of choice for determining causal influences, these are not always practical or ethical to answer vital questions in health and social research (e.g., one cannot assign individuals to a "childhood trauma condition" in studying the causal effects of childhood trauma on depression). Key to solving such questions are observational studies. Mendelian Randomization (MR) is an influential method to establish causality in observational studies. MR uses genetic variants to test causal relationships between exposures/risk factors and outcomes such as physical or mental health. Yet, individual genetic variants have small effects, and so, when used as instrumental variables, render MR liable to weak instrument bias. Polygenic scores have the advantage of larger effects, but may be characterized by horizontal pleiotropy, which violates a central assumption of MR. We developed the MR-DoC twin model by integrating MR with the Direction of Causation twin model. This model allows us to test pleiotropy directly. We considered the issue of parameter identification, and given identification, we conducted extensive power calculations. MR-DoC allows one to test causal hypotheses and to obtain unbiased estimates of the causal effect given pleiotropic instruments, while controlling for genetic and environmental influences common to the outcome and exposure. Furthermore, the approach allows one to employ strong instrumental variables in the form of polygenic scores, guarding against weak instrument bias, and increasing the power to detect causal effects of exposures on potential outcomes. Beside allowing to test pleiotropy directly, incorporating in MR data collected from relatives provide additional within-family data that resolve additional assumptions like random mating, the absence of the gene-environment interaction/covariance, no dyadic effects. Our approach will enhance and extend MR's range of applications, and increase the value of the large cohorts collected at twin/family registries as they correctly detect causation and estimate effect sizes even in the presence of pleiotropy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.