Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882051›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2018

Burned bodies: post-mortem computed tomography, an essential tool for modern forensic medicine.

J-B Coty, C Nedelcu, S Yahya, V Dupont, C Rougé-Maillart, M Verschoore, C Ridereau Zins, C Aubé

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Homicides Disguised as Fire Deaths.Acta medica Lituanic · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J-B CotyDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Medicine University of Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Cedex 9, Angers, France. jeanbaptiste.coty@chu-angers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-6085
C NedelcuDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
S YahyaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Medicine University of Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Cedex 9, Angers, France.
V DupontDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
C Rougé-MaillartDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Angers, Medicine University of Angers, Angers, France.
M VerschooreDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
C Ridereau ZinsDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
C AubéDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Medicine University of Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Cedex 9, Angers, France.
Université d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) has become an accessible and contemporary tool for forensic investigations. In the case of burn victims, it provides specific semiologies requiring a prudent understanding to differentiate between the normal post-mortem changes from heat-related changes. The aim of this pictorial essay is to provide to the radiologist the keys to establish complete and focused reports in cases of PMCT of burn victims. Thus, the radiologist must discern all the contextual divergences with the forensic history, and must be able to report all the relevant elements to answer to the forensic pathologist the following questions: Are there tomographic features that could help to identify the victim? Is there evidence of remains of biological fluids in liquid form available for toxicological analysis and DNA sampling? Is there another obvious cause of death than heat-related lesions, especially metallic foreign bodies of ballistic origin? Finally, what are the characteristic burn-related injuries seen on the corpse that should be sought during the autopsy? TEACHING POINTS: • CT is highly useful to find features permitting the identification of a severely burned body. • PMCT is a major asset in gunshot injuries to depict ballistic foreign bodies in the burned cadavers. • CT is able to recognise accessible blood for tests versus heat clot (air-crescent sign). • Heat-related fractures are easily differentiated from traumatic fractures. • Epidural collections with a subdural appearance are typical heat-related head lesions.

Indexed as

Burned bodiesPost-mortem computed tomographyThermal amputationThermal epidural haematoma

Identifiers

PMID29882051
PMCPMC6206378
OpenAlexW2806313755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.