Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29882015›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2018

Differential associations of combined vs. isolated cannabis and nicotine on brain resting state networks.

Francesca M Filbey, Suril Gohel, Shikha Prashad, Bharat B Biswal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adolescent Cannabinoid and Nicotine Exposure Differentially Alters Adult Nicotine Self-Administration in Males and Females.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca M FilbeyCenter for BrainHealth, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA. Francesca.Filbey@utdallas.edu.
Suril GohelDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Shikha PrashadCenter for BrainHealth, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Bharat B BiswalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

The Role of Motivation and Control in Cannabis Use Disorders: A Cross-Cultural Longitudinal Neuroimaging StudyR01DA042490 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI COUSIJN, JANNA, FILBEY, FRANCESCA · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
Genetic and Environmental Modulators of the Brain's Response to Marijuana CuesR01DA030344 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FILBEY, FRANCESCA · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
The Effects of CNR1 on Brain Function in Cannabis UsersK01DA021632 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FILBEY, FRANCESCA · 2007 to 2011
$931k
CRCNS: Neurophysiological Basis of Brain ConnectivityR01DA038895 · NIDA · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN · 2014 to 2016
$381k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA021632NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030344NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038895NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042490NIH HHS R01DA030344-01A1NIH HHS R01 DA038895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concomitant cannabis and nicotine use is more prevalent than cannabis use alone; however, to date, most of the literature has focused on associations of isolated cannabis and nicotine use limiting the generalizability of existing research. To determine differential associations of concomitant use of cannabis and nicotine, isolated cannabis use and isolated nicotine use on brain network connectivity, we examined systems-level neural functioning via independent components analysis (ICA) on resting state networks (RSNs) in cannabis users (CAN, n = 53), nicotine users (NIC, n = 28), concomitant nicotine and cannabis users (NIC + CAN, n = 26), and non-users (CTRL, n = 30). Our results indicated that the CTRL group and NIC + CAN users had the greatest functional connectivity relative to CAN users and NIC users in 12 RSNs: anterior default mode network (DMN), posterior DMN, left frontal parietal network, lingual gyrus, salience network, right frontal parietal network, higher visual network, insular cortex, cuneus/precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus/middle temporal gyrus, dorsal attention network, and basal ganglia network. Post hoc tests showed no significant differences between (1) CTRL and NIC + CAN and (2) NIC and CAN users. These findings of differential associations of isolated vs. combined nicotine and cannabis use demonstrate an interaction between cannabis and nicotine use on RSNs. These unique and combined mechanisms through which cannabis and nicotine influence cortical network functional connectivity are important to consider when evaluating the neurobiological pathways associated with cannabis and nicotine use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingCohort StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleGanglionic StimulantsHead MovementsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMedical MarijuanaNeural PathwaysNicotinePlant ExtractsGanglionic StimulantsMedical MarijuanaNicotinePlant ExtractsAddictionCannabisFunctional connectivityIndependent component analysisNicotineResting state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID29882015
PMCPMC6286234
OpenAlexW2806841928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.