Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881974›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2018

Review: mapping proteins localized in adhesive setae of the tokay gecko and their possible influence on the mechanism of adhesion.

Lorenzo Alibardi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lorenzo AlibardiComparative Histolab Padua, Bologna, Italy. lorenzo.alibardi@unibo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital adhesive pads that allow gecko lizards to climb vertical surfaces result from the modification of the oberhautchen layer of the epidermis in normal scales. This produces sticky filaments of 10-100 μm in length, called setae that are composed of various proteins. The prevalent types, termed corneous beta proteins (CBPs), have a low molecular weight (12-20 kDa) and contain a conserved central region of 34 amino acids with a beta-conformation. This determines their polymerization into long beta-filaments that aggregate into corneous beta-bundles that form the framework of setae. Previous studies showed that the prevalent CBPs in the setae of Gekko gecko are cysteine-rich and are distributed from the base to the tip of adhesive setae, called spatulae. The molecular analysis of these proteins, although the three-dimensional structure remains undetermined, indicates that most of them are charged positively and some contain aromatic amino acids. These characteristics may impede adhesion by causing the setae to stick together but may also potentiate the van der Waals interactions responsible for most of the adhesion process on hydrophobic or hydrophilic substrates. The review stresses that not only the nanostructural shape and the high number of setae present in adhesive pads but also the protein composition of setae influence the strength of adhesion to almost any type of substrate. Therefore, formulation of dry materials mimicking gecko adhesiveness should also consider the chemical nature of the polymers utilized to fabricate the future dry adhesives in order to obtain the highest performance.

Indexed as

AdhesivenessAnimalsLizardsProteinsProteinsAdhesive padsGecko lizardImmunolocalizationProtein compositionSetae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.